Why single out private education? Public education is 100% subsidised and costs the govt a lot more per student. Why single out middle class welfare? What about those who are 100% subsidised, or the greater than 50% of workers who receive more in welfare than they pay in tax? What subsidies are their in superannuation or wealth creation?(a reduced tax rate is NOT a subsidy). Your whole post is built on BS and is either some ideological crusade or a self interest one. Any disclosures to make?
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Why shouldn’t renewables be subsidised?
Why single out private education? Public education is 100%...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online