I mean, that's not how it happened.. There were two separate...

  1. 1,369 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 55
    I mean, that's not how it happened.. 
    There were two separate cases, two separate 'events', different years, different kids. Just because a jury deems not enough evidence to convict on one case doesn't mean the other case would be the same. 

    What a really odd conspiracy theory to peddle. 

    He sexually assaulted kids. Are you saying he did not do this? If so, why not? And what evidence do you have that supersedes all the information available to the case? and most importantly, if you have this information, why have you not supplied it to the police?

    And if you're saying he did assault the children, how is some theory about church finances relevant? He was first accused back in 2002.. well before his appointment in the role in 2014, heck this started getting traction in 2013.. still before he took that role.

    Peddling false information is dangerous.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.