I mean, that's not how it happened..
There were two separate cases, two separate 'events', different years, different kids. Just because a jury deems not enough evidence to convict on one case doesn't mean the other case would be the same.
What a really odd conspiracy theory to peddle.
He sexually assaulted kids. Are you saying he did not do this? If so, why not? And what evidence do you have that supersedes all the information available to the case? and most importantly, if you have this information, why have you not supplied it to the police?
And if you're saying he did assault the children, how is some theory about church finances relevant? He was first accused back in 2002.. well before his appointment in the role in 2014, heck this started getting traction in 2013.. still before he took that role.
Peddling false information is dangerous.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Was Pell getting too close to exposing the Vatican finances?
I mean, that's not how it happened.. There were two separate...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online