1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers

U.S to run Baghdad after war

  1. kopiteau

    1,197 Posts.
    Article in the SMH. - say no more.


    Life after Saddam: US to run Baghdad
    By David Sanger and Eric Schmitt in Washington
    October 12 2002

    The White House is developing a detailed plan, modelled on the postwar occupation of Japan, to install an American-led military government in Iraq if the United States topples Saddam Hussein, senior
    administration officials said.

    The plan also calls for war-crimes trials of Iraqi leaders and a slow transition to an elected civilian government that could take months or years.

    In the initial phase, Iraq would be governed by an American military commander - perhaps General Tommy Franks, head of US forces in the Gulf, or one of his subordinates - who would assume essentially the role General Douglas MacArthur served in Japan after its surrender
    in 1945.

    News of the plan came as the US Senate authorised President George Bush to wage war if necessary against Iraq.

    Handing Mr Bush a major victory, the Democratic-led Senate voted 77-23 for a war-powers resolution backing a possible use of force to rid Iraq of suspected weapons of mass destruction and possibly oust the Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein.

    One senior official said the Administration was "coalescing around" the concept of a US-led military government in Iraq, following discussions of various options with Mr Bush and his senior aides. But the official and others cautioned that there had not yet been any formal approval of an occupation plan, and it was not clear whether allies had been consulted on it.

    In contemplating an occupation, the Administration is scaling back the initial role for Iraqi opposition forces in a post-Saddam government. Until now it had been widely assumed Iraqi dissidents both inside and outside the country would form a government, but it was never clear when they would take full control.

    Thursday marked the first time the Administration has discussed what could be a long occupation by coalition forces, led by the US.

    Officials said they want to avoid the chaos and infighting that have plagued Afghanistan since the defeat of the Taliban. Mr Bush's aides said they also want full control over Iraq while US-led forces carry out their main mission of finding and destroying weapons of mass destruction.

    The description of the emerging US plan and the possibility of trials of Iraqi leaders for war crimes could be part of an Administration effort to warn Iraq's generals of the unpleasant future they face if they continue to support Saddam.

    Asked what would happen if US pressure prompted a coup against Saddam, a senior official said: "That would be nice." But the official suggested the US military might enter and secure the country anyway, not only to eliminate weapons of mass destruction but to ensure against anarchy in the weeks and months after Saddam's removal.

    The revelation of the occupation plan marks the first time the Administration has described in detail how it would administer Iraq in the days and weeks after a possible invasion, and how it would keep the country unified while searching for weapons of mass destruction.

    It would put an American officer in charge for a year or more while the US and its allies searched for weapons and got Iraq's oil fields working.

    For as long as the US and its coalition partners ran Iraq, they would essentially control the second largest reserves of oil in the world, comprising nearly 11 per cent of the world's proven resources. The United Nations oil-for-food program would be expanded to help finance the country's stabilisation and reconstruction, a senior Administration official said.

    Officials said the State Department, CIA and, ultimately, the White House were not keen on the idea of a provisional Iraqi-run government. "We're just not sure what influence that groups on the outside would have on the inside," one said. "There would also be differences among Iraqis, and we don't want chaos and anarchy in the early process."


Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.


Thank you for visiting HotCopper

We have detected that you are running ad blocking software.

HotCopper relies on revenue generated from advertisers. Kindly disable your ad blocking software to return to the HotCopper website.

I understand, I have disabled my ad blocker. Let me in!

Need help? Click here for support.