1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers

thinking americans say no to war!

  1. klown

    3,363 posts.
    Think how many times over the past month you heard someone from the Bush party rail Iraq for their misinterpretation of UN Resolution 1441. The argument is the same, with a typical Dubya stab like, “1441 demanded full and immediate disarmament, not hints of progress or minor concessions.'' Okay Bush actually did say that, and he may be right, but if war is the remedy for broken UN Resolutions, we better initiate the draft.

    The media won’t tell you about the Resolutions our allies have broken. It’s just better to stick to why we hate our enemies. For example, you think you’d ever hear Rummy blast Israel for breaking UN Resolution 1435, which calls for the end of military activities in and around Ramallah-- including the destruction of security and civilian infrastructure? Or for Resolution 353 calling on Turkey to respect the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Cyprus, and for their withdrawal of foreign troops from that area?

    In all, our allies Turkey and Israel are breaking over 50 UN Resolutions. The US focus on Saddam should raise questions among any thinking person. What are Bush’s real intentions in Iraq? Are his true motives to enforce international law? Is it to disarm Saddam because he has broken UN Resolution 1441? What do you think?

    Using the guise of international security and the policy power of the United States, Bush has garnered support for his pre-emptive attack on Iraq. Most say it will start going down in mid-March, after we are in Baghdad, shooting away. Over 700 missiles are already aimed at the city, and they are soon to be fired. Why then are we not shooting missiles or dropping bombs on Israel for breaking UN Resolution 1402, which demands that they withdraw their military from all Palestinian cities?

    So what if this isn’t about breaking resolutions? What if this is about Saddam’s human rights record? That’s touchy for the Bush squad. Especially when his daddy was VP under Reagan, who in the late 80s supplied Saddam with the gas he used on the Kurds. Also tough when our ally Turkey’s human rights violations against Cyprus have been chastised by the European Commission of Human Rights, and the UN. But team Dubya won’t go there, they need Turkey’s help when the attack on Baghdad kicks off.

    Saddam is a nasty dictator. But the case has not yet been made for an attack on Iraq. Bush’s arguments for war are catchy, but toothless, only meriting skepticism.

    Saddam doesn’t have nukes. The UN says Saddam is complying with most of their demands. Our intelligence tells us if Saddam does have biological weapons, he will be more apt to use them against Iraqi civilians and our soldiers. The CIA also tells us terrorist activity in the US is more likely to increase if we start hurling our missiles all over Iraq, putting even more Americans at risk.

    Bush hasn’t made his case. Opposing the upcoming attack is the only thing a thinking person can do.

DISCLAIMER:
Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.

Top