Hi, Number 1:  75k cap ,agree with decision, was too easy to get...

  1. 6,369 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 281
    Hi,
    Number 1:  75k cap ,agree with decision, was too easy to get large sums into a tax protected environment
    Number 2: top up, a good policy, aimed at the lower end, disagree with decision
    Number 3: end deductibility of personal contributions, disagree, shouldn't matter where you earn it , grossly unfair if employees are still allowed salary sacrifice deductions.
    Number 4: increase contribution tax on post 200k incomes, cant get too upset about this.
    Number 5: no borrowing, agree, should never have been allowed for a whole host of reasons

    Number 2 is incomprehensible.
    Number 3 is obviously aimed at self employed, back to the future, this setup prompted heaps of companies being formed back in the dark ages.
    Hit the middle back then, will do the same this time. At least the accountants will be happy.
                             cheers
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.