Today's daily commentary by Richard Russell in his Dow Theory Letters has been posted in the clear at 321Gold, and some readers are remarking that Russell has just gotten closer than ever to acknowledging manipulation of the gold market.
Russell writes:
"The 'battle of gold' has been long and arduous. The central banks want to control the world's money, and gold (real money) is in their way. Therefore, the central banks have fought gold both economically and psychologically. They've fought gold economically by periodically selling portions of their gold holdings. They've fought gold psychologically by implying that fiat money is real money and gold is 'an ancient relic.' This 'war against gold' worked for many years but it stopped working around 2001-2002. It stopped working when smart money started accumulating gold when the metal got down to absurd prices around $250 to the ounce."
Russell has earned respect as a longtime gold advocate but that is exactly why his tentative recognition of what has been going on is so pathetic. For it comes as he repeatedly remarks that he is having more trouble than ever figuring out the markets, Dow Theory seemingly proving less and less reliable.
Of course Dow Theory is less reliable because there really are no longer markets as markets have been understood; instead there are mainly surreptitious government interventions and manipulations. What GATA Chairman Bill Murphy first established with gold, tying it to the coordinated interventions of bullion banks and central banks, and what GATA board member Mike Bolser first established with the bond and equity markets, tying them to the Federal Reserve's daily repurchase agreements, what Sprott Asset Management's John Embry and Andrew Hepburn compiled in their magnificent report on the rigging of the gold market in August 2004 and their magnificent report on the rigging of the equities market this August -- all this seems to have gone over Russell's head. Even Dennis Gartman of The Gartman Letter, no friend of gold, picked up on it before Russell did.
Maybe it is understandable enough -- for anyone who, like Russell, has built a career as a technician cannot want to know that all this stuff is utterly meaningless now that the data is not the market talking but rather the government.
For GATA supporters, the best part of the Connecticut newspaper story dispatched to them today about the latest Sprott report, the one on the U.S. government's repeated intervention in support of the equities market, came in the last several sentences. Asked for comment on the report, the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Treasury Department all declined.
Perhaps news organizations with more influence can be persuaded to thrust the Sprott report into the hands of U.S. government publicists and will have better luck getting responses. Russell, a highly respected newsletter writer with an influential audience, should try it himself and stop confusing himself with his charts.