1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers
SLX 20.0¢

oz - nuke armed????!!!!

  1. Yak

    13,672 Posts.

    Well this will set the cat amongst the pigeons, wont it???

    New Aussie nuke claim
    By Lincoln Wright
    September 21, 2003

    AUSTRALIAN scientists are researching cheaper ways of enriching uranium - possibly a significant step on the road to making nuclear weapons.

    The revelation comes as the Federal Government considers tough new "Vanunu-style" laws to gag nuclear whistleblowers.

    Israel jailed former nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu for 18 years in 1988 after he revealed details of Israel's secret nuclear weapons program.

    Scientists working for Silex Systems Ltd, which leases space at the Commonwealth Government's Lucas Heights reactor near Sydney, are developing techniques to enrich uranium with lasers.

    The company was funded by the United States Enrichment Corporation - the world's biggest enricher of uranium - until earlier this year.

    Laser technology enriches uranium cheaper than standard techniques, providing fuel for nuclear reactors and, as a by-product, plutonium for nuclear weapons.

    Richard Broinowski, a former ambassador to South Korea and Mexico, said he was suspicious of the secrecy surrounding the classified Silex technology.

    "There is an ongoing need for technology that we can use, if necessary, in nuclear weapons-making, though they'd never say it," he said.

    Mr Broinowski is the author of a new book, Fact or Fission - the truth about Australia's nuclear ambitions.

    "Bob Hawke closed down Lucas Heights when it was run by the Australian Atomic Energy Commission, partly because he was suspicious of the secrecy there," Mr Broinowski said.

    "Hawke was suspicious that they were developing nuclear weapons technology. In particular, there was a very large enrichment project at that time."

    The laser technology could be used for civil or military purposes, he said.

    "There are people in the Australian Government who would like to have the option of developing our technology to the stage where we could produce weapons if we needed to. I'm sure of that."

    But Mr Broinowski said the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty was still a big constraint on Australia's ambitions.

    And Lucas Heights had other purposes, such as maintaining Australia's seat on the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and producing radio-pharmaceuticals.

    The Sunday Herald Sun reported in July that Lucas Heights was regarded by nuclear experts as an insurance policy if ever Australia needed the bomb.

    But Silex has dismissed claims linking its research to a future weapons program, as did Dr George Collins, acting head of the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, whichmanages the reactor. Dr Collins said there was "a strong ethos here that we do not work on nuclear weapons and we actively support non-proliferation".

    He added: "There is no skill base here appropriate for nuclear weaponry."

    Professor George Dracoulis, head of nuclear physics at the Australian National University, was also sceptical about the claims.

    "The whole idea of Lucas Heights being a precursor to a nuclear weapons program is just wrong-headed," he said.

    Australia seriously considered the nuclear option after World War II, but decided against it. The Government denies any interest now.

    The secrecy of the Silex research is one reason for the crackdown on whistleblowers. Another is concern that terrorists will secure the technology.

    The Opposition, the Democrats, and environmental groups have jumped on planned changes to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation (Safeguards) Act.

    People passing information that threatens the physical security of a nuclear plant or reveal information about nuclear technology could face two years in jail.

    Herald Sun




DISCLAIMER:
Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.

Top

Thank you for visiting HotCopper

We have detected that you are running ad blocking software.


HotCopper relies on revenue generated from advertisers. Kindly disable your ad blocking software to return to the HotCopper website.

I understand, I have disabled my ad blocker. Let me in!

Need help? Click here for support.