1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers

NRL rules rejig puts referees

  1. justajoe

    2,704 Posts.

    NRL rules rejig puts referees on the spot and coaches, players and fans in a world of confusion



    Ruck or maul: Will new rules confuse players and fans? Photo: Chris Lane
    Rugby league in 2015 is at risk of suffering rugby union's biggest blight: fans wondering why the referee blew his whistle.
    Coaches and players will share the confusion. A change in the interpretation of the rules for this season means there will be even more inconsistency with ruck penalties, following the uncertainty of the past few years. An off-season edict instructing all tacklers to immediately release themselves from the ball carrier means there will be untidy rucks, with tacklers strewn around the play-the-ball and dummy-half runners seeking to win penalties by colliding with players unable to retreat 10 metres in defence.
    Rugby league's great boast over the 15-a-side game is that its players and fans usually know why the referee blew his whistle. The myriad reasons a rugby union referee can penalise rucks and mauls has long perplexed the code's supporters, with even internationals asking each other "what was that for?".
    Now, both codes will have untidy rucks, with referees' interpretation influencing the outcome of games. Penalties and repeat sets already produce about one-third of tries in the NRL.
    Last season, latitude was allowed with defenders releasing themselves in two stages, giving them time to assume positions as markers. Now, as they release immediately, some tacklers will be desperately trying to unlock their arms, others lying to the side of the ruck and most off balance as the ball is played.
    Not only will it result in more dummy-half running, but more dummy-half running to win a penalty.
    NRL head of football Todd Greenberg says referees have been attending opposed sessions at NRL clubs, with 25 sessions held over two weeks, educating players and coaches on the new ruck requirement. However, NRL coaches talk to each other and suspect that what had been allowed by one referee at say, Canberra, has not been followed in Sydney.
    Referees have told coaches they do not like the new ruck interpretation, with their boss, Tony Archer, a critic. They are aware they will wear the criticism for blowing, or not blowing, the whistle.
    "I'm confident the referees are OK about it," Greenberg said. "In fact, they have been fantastic. It's not a rule change. It's a change in the interpretation of the rule."
    Asked whether he agreed rugby league was headed in the same direction as rugby union, with untidy rucks and confusing penalties, Greenberg said, "We are pushing for consistency. We're driving referees for accountability. We have metrics in place to assess them. Ultimately, they are no different to players in being measured."
    The edict sent out on December 23, lists nine "Methods that impede the immediate release of the player in possession":
    a. Flop onto the player in possession who is grounded;
    b. Working the player in possession;
    c. Leg pulls;
    d. Leaving or placing the hands or arms on the ball or the arms of the player in possession once the tackle is complete;
    e. Spinning on the player in possession once the tackle is complete;
    f. Defenders "peeling off" the player in possession;
    g. Climbing over the player in possession once the tackle is complete;
    h. Crowding the player in possession once the tackle is complete using their knees, arms or body;
    i. Pulls the player in possession to the ground once the tackle is complete.
    The referee will be required to do a mental check list of these offences and, satisfied the play-the-ball was quick, will then be required to rule on possible impediments in no man's land, with players strewn around the ruck.

DISCLAIMER:
Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.

Top

Thank you for visiting HotCopper

We have detected that you are running ad blocking software.


HotCopper relies on revenue generated from advertisers. Kindly disable your ad blocking software to return to the HotCopper website.

I understand, I have disabled my ad blocker. Let me in!

Need help? Click here for support.