1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers

nato breaks monthlong impasse on iraq

  1. NATO Breaks Monthlong Impasse on Iraq
    3 minutes ago

    By PAUL GEITNER, Associated Press Writer

    BRUSSELS, Belgium - NATO (news - web sites), in the midst of its biggest rift since the Cold War, broke a monthlong stalemate Sunday over defensive actions in case of war in Iraq, reaffirming alliance solidarity while supporting U.N. efforts for a peaceful solution.

    Latest news:
    • Bush Aide Hedges on New Iraq Resolution
    AP - 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
    • Iraq Mourns Civilian Victims of Gulf War
    AP - Sun Feb 16, 2:55 PM ET
    • U.S., Britain Reworking Iraq Resolution
    AP - Sun Feb 16,12:57 AM ET
    Special Coverage





    "Alliance solidarity has prevailed," NATO Secretary-General Lord Robertson said. "We have been able collectively to overcome the impasse."


    After France was shut out of the room, two other holdouts — Germany and Belgium — dropped their objections to starting the planning for Turkey's defense immediately, NATO officials said.


    Belgium insisted at the last minute on linking any eventual NATO deployment to developments at the U.N. Security Council.


    But the final statement says: "We continue to support efforts in the United Nations (news - web sites) to find a peaceful solution to the crisis."


    NATO diplomats said the United States and other allies objected in principle to tying alliance decision-making to any other organization.


    For the past month, Belgium, France and Germany blocked a NATO decision to begin planning to help defend Turkey — the only NATO ally bordering Iraq — against any potential reprisals for a U.S. attack. They argued that such a move was premature and would undermine U.N. efforts to avoid a war.


    NATO, trying to end the stalemate, put the issue Sunday to its Defense Planning Committee, which excludes France. Paris left NATO's military command structure in the late 1960s and participates only in political consultations.


    The committee was used ahead of the 1991 war against Iraq to approve aid for Turkey. But NATO has sought to limit its use since the end of the Cold War in a spirit of rapprochement with Paris.


    Some progress was made after "very intensive negotiations," a NATO official said, adding that the idea of starting planning was now "uncontested."


    The United States proposed a month ago that the alliance consider sending early-warning AWACS aircraft, missile defenses and anti-biochemical units to Turkey.


    But after France, Germany and Belgium blocked that planning for three weeks, Turkey on Feb. 10 invoked NATO's mutual defense treaty, which binds the allies to talks when one feels threatened.


    Turkey feels especially vulnerable, especially as it considers allowing tens of thousands of U.S. soldiers to use Turkish facilities for a possible war on Iraq.


    The United States and its allies say denying support for Turkey's defense erodes the alliance's credibility and sends the wrong signal to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites).


    Some of the measures can be done bilaterally — Germany has already agreed to send Patriot missiles to Turkey via the Netherlands — but those missiles need to be linked to NATO radar networks to be effective.


    Germany and other countries also have promised AWACS crews, but the planes themselves are NATO assets.


    The monthlong dispute has driven a deep wedge into the 53-year-old alliance.


    It also has exacerbated tensions within Europe ahead of Monday's emergency summit of 15 European Union (news - web sites) leaders, who are trying to reconcile their own differing policies on Iraq.

    Britain, Spain, Denmark and Italy have backed President Bush (news - web sites), while France and Germany have tried to slow what they view as his rush to war.




DISCLAIMER:
Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.

Top