Thanks Philip 1965 for all your GENAi analysis.There are always...

Thanks Philip 1965 for all your GENAi analysis.

There are always issues with GENAi analysis in my experience and these are the issues I see with what has been presented.

1. In the comparison with Snapdragon technology it is clear that it is only comparing AKD1000 but does not specify this to be the case using the generic AKIDA terminology. AKD1000 while exceptional technology has been improved in further developments of the AKIDA technology family with the introduction of AKD1500, AKIDA 2.0 TENNS/Vit and Pico. For example it makes the point about AKD1000 not being able to process camera feeds with the same accuracy yet this is what AKIDA 2.0 Vit addresses even before the later advances with TENNS comes into consideration.

2. Then in considering a valuation of Brainchip it ignores the ability of AKIDA Pico to bring LLM's and GENAi to micro dot chips in unconnected low powered devices. This being something which is clearly beneficial in mobile phones but which is way beyond anything Qualcomm can offer.

3. It ignores the fact that AKD1000 has been proven as being capable of replacing GPUs for various applications by Edge Impulse, ISL, Quantum Ventura, Bascom Hunter etc;

4. It ignores the fact that AKD1000 has been shown to be capable of ZeroEnergy applications in particular cognitive communications by Ericsson and ISL which opens up commercial opportunities in 5 & 6 G networks and Satellite communication systems.

5. It ignores the fact that AKD1000 has been proven by ISL to have the ability to make all radar intelligent in ultra low power small form factor.

6. It ignores the fact that TENNS, Pleiades, aTENNuate and Centaurus have the ability to be implemented in data centres to dramatically improve the power consumption and performance of conventional data centres even if not being implemented on AKIDA technology.

7. It ignores the cyber security applications for AKD1000 proven by Quantum Ventura.

I could go on but I think you should ask your GENAi platform how up to date the information is that it relies upon to provide the analysis as it has been the case that it was running about 2 years behind. I have had many apologies when I have asked it why it did not have regard to certain known facts it advising that these facts were too recent.

I also think it would be useful to ask it to specify which AKIDA technology it is referring to rather than lumping it under the term AKIDA when AKIDA technology covers multiple iterations and presently can be manufactured in one node configurations right through to 256 node configurations based upon AKD1000 IP, AKD1500 IP and AKIDA 2.0 IP.

My opinion only DYOR

Fact Finder