The great no-no on my forum is the ad populum argument, Mr Jones.
But lets look at some of what you posted with these examples ...
"Intelligent Design (ID) is a term that implies creation." = Creationism by another name.
"The ID Movement has deliberately chosen not to specify the identity of the Designer." = "deliberately" deceptive.
"Everybody has the right to believe in a Designer according his own theology."= If teddy designed you then you had better believe it boyo.
"What makes the movement effective is its emphasis on solid scientific evidence." = an "emphasis" on untruth so don't look at the detail.
"The real issue is whether life is created by God or evolved by itself." = A non issue in an infinite universe.
"Are they being indoctrinated by the myths of Darwinism?" = Only if they have caught the teddy mind virus first which usually is control stamped at an early age for obvious reasons.
"We have to defend faith against unbelief." = we need to control youzall.