mr jones and maradona, page-8

  1. 1,799 Posts.


    The great no-no on my forum is the ad populum argument, Mr Jones.

    But lets look at some of what you posted with these examples ...

    "Intelligent Design (ID) is a term that implies creation." = Creationism by another name.

    "The ID Movement has deliberately chosen not to specify the identity of the Designer." = "deliberately" deceptive.

    "Everybody has the right to believe in a Designer according his own theology."= If teddy designed you then you had better believe it boyo.

    "What makes the movement effective is its emphasis on solid scientific evidence." = an "emphasis" on untruth so don't look at the detail.

    "The real issue is whether life is created by God or evolved by itself." = A non issue in an infinite universe.

    "Are they being indoctrinated by the myths of Darwinism?" = Only if they have caught the teddy mind virus first which usually is control stamped at an early age for obvious reasons.

    "We have to defend faith against unbelief." = we need to control youzall.


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.