Yes and I am certain test-on you will.
Albeit at a cost to the shareholder and in the absence of any of these eco-high-tech-wonder-offtakes which seem to be all the discussion these days. MNS will foot the bill for testing and it will be a long, long, long time before any substantive progress is made. By that time all the true first movers (KNL, SYR) will be out the gates.
MNS seems to be infected with marketing tactics about product differentiation, distinguishing from its peers and trying to appear 'sexy' with the latest eco-buzzwords.
However I think the practical and commercial reality is that these tactics can only achieve so much in a world where companies are tuned into the risks - would they rather a known chemically purified product or an unknown product that is not commercially proven.
I know what their insurers and end-user consumers (i.e. people using a phone or a car) would prefer, and that's not to be the victim of malfunction or even grevious bodily injuries owing to such a malfunction.
I think Chinese companies have a bit of a reputation for flouting safety on end-user consumers, so perhaps that's why they are interested in MNS' product.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- MNS
- MNS processing is too risky
MNS processing is too risky, page-5
- There are more pages in this discussion • 183 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add MNS (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
4.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $50.37M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
MNS (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable