1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers
LUM 2.3¢

lum - classic comments for 2003

  1. G'day,

    I posted here a few days back when LUM was much higher. At that point in time I said LUM can't be valued on fundamentals as it has none (of substance) i.e makes nooooooo money and pays no yield. Secondly, technically it looks like a goana's testicles (what ever that looks like).

    I appreciate that we all make mistakes but some people are in denial in a masssssssssssssive way.

    2003 Classic Comment - Down ramping:- I wonder if those making such comments have thought maybe the stock is over priced? just a thought.

    As per Australian Idol (Australia has spoken) - The market has spoken LUM is trending or spiralling downward fast.

    Just a thought - people posting maybe trying to guide others from making mistakes they once made!!!

    I wish you all the best with LUM - I think you will need it....

    Regards, THE SQUAWK

DISCLAIMER:
Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.

Top