Share
10,048 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
clock Created with Sketch.
06/05/26
15:05
Share
Originally posted by DBT9:
↑
Why do you keep invoking the 'prove a negative' fallacy? Science can't prove that there aren't invisible magic pixies living at the bottom of your garden, which still means that there is no reason to believe in their existence. The same applies to the countless versions of God or gods, that without evidence for their existence, there is no reason to be believe in their existence. Justification comes with evidence, not its absence. How many times has this been explained? Do you not read the explantion, or perhaps not understand the fallacy?
Expand
>>>>""Why do you keep invoking the 'prove a negative' fallacy? Is your claim that something only comes into existence once there is empirical evidence ?