Derailing. I already responded to your first article re Michael...

  1. 1,458 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 126
    Derailing. I already responded to your first article re Michael Mann so you post another.
    What really transpired
    Some people have “cherry-picked” a limited selection of CRU email statements to draw broad, unsubstantiated conclusions about the validity of all climate science.

    Wednesday’s ruling affirms the thrust of Combs Greene’s order, however. It also concludes that “a reasonable jury” may “find the statement that Dr. Mann ‘molested and tortured data’ was false,

    All of it

    I already posted that there are many more scientists in the BBC production which you conveniently ignore. Why?

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.