Meyer has no real point to make. His argument basically comes down to the God of the Gaps fallacy....if we don't know something, God is responsible. We don't know X, therefore God.
The correct approach is: we don't know X, let's set to work and find out how it works.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- Cambrian explosion even bigget
Meyer has no real point to make. His argument basically comes...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)