1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers

Any legal eagles out there??

  1. Yak

    13,672 Posts.

    Any advice

    1. Had a claim against an insurance company that really bad damage to wooden floors was a result of maliscious and /or vandalism behavior.
    2. Agents told me to get it fixed but take pictures - did so
    3. Assessor got letter from repairmen that said"no way it was normal wear and tear" and "could only be maliscious"
    3. Pictures clearly showed the damage
    4. Assessor added his comment it may have been something like a tenent walking all over the floor in high heels
    5. Repairmen said "no - not like that at all - more like a someone with golf shoes or footy shoes".
    6. I suggested it almost looked like someone hitting the floor repeatedly with a small hammer or a kitchen utensil
    7. Insurance rejected claim saying it was" normal wear and use by a tenant"
    8. Invited me to appeal via their in-house conflict resolutuion officer - and HEY - he supported the co.
    9. Went to the Insurance enquiries and Complaints Ltd who's supposed to be impartial and they said that it was up to me to establish on balance of probabilities that I had suffered an insurable loss as per plan

    With that, they reject the insurance notion of it being "normal living wear and tear"

    But then - and here's the rub - they reject the damage was malicious. They say the repairmen's version doesnt really help me and my thoughts about the hammer was speculative

    As well and IMPORTANTLY, evidence was given that the tenenats were "from hell" with lots of other damage not claimed for, police raids including swat teams, left owing a heap of rent, the place was a bloddy shambles and there are 2 other landlords after them

    The arguemnet was made if there is any doubt as to whether the damage was malicious then the actions and behaviours of the tenants need to be seen as a context.

    No mention of this in the findings

    They supported the insurance company inrejecting the claim

    Does anyone think I can take this to small claims court???

Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.


Thank you for visiting HotCopper

We have detected that you are running ad blocking software.

HotCopper relies on revenue generated from advertisers. Kindly disable your ad blocking software to return to the HotCopper website.

I understand, I have disabled my ad blocker. Let me in!

Need help? Click here for support.