Page 11 under "Who is CGB"? I agree they use "has" and "has been" but in reference to bauxite AND hemp etc so your point is?
Page 15 under "Business Model" - the very first line for "key business strategies" starts with "The Company’s current activities involve thedevelopment of its Bauxite Projects to acommercial stage,.." before mentioning MCL. Why would you highlight this first if you're changing business to a Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology and Life Sciences company and moving away from minerals? Like I said confusing prospective investors; is this a pot company or a mining company??
Page 16 in regards to generating income, bauxite still mentioned as a longer term prospective. So effectively '
we're in this bauxite for the long haul folks' and your funds/investment are being spread across hemp/mm and minerals again in my opinion
Page 16 under "Main Objectives", first complete the transactions, list on the ASX, and third point/objective is the
bauxite! and comes before MCL (again). By now if I was a potential investor looking for a pot stock I'd be scratching my head. Seriously, what IS this company focused on?
Exactly the same priorities are listed on Page 33.
On page 34 "use of funds" indicates between $100-300k on bauxite when the geologist costs the company $360kpa. What are the holding costs for the tenements, statutory minimum expenditure commitments, costs for the ML plus the geologist(s) total? If you think it's only $100-300k Luke then I'm not the one confused I think...