Buying a higher percentage ore to mix with their own is good management in order to fulfil an order, and I fail to understand why the downrampers are using this as an excuse to trash the company.
I read the transcript of the interview, CG confirmed that IFO is a middleman who arranges the purchases for different end users. This is what I suggested when a previous post implied they were some kind of sham company because they couldn't find anything except a registered office address for them. IFO is going to bring them purchase orders of different percentage strength and at different price points. Some posters are fixated on the point that they need to have the highest possible percentage and they don't yet have this, but to run a business, you need to be able to supply what the customer wants. NSL has shown that they can do this by thinking outside the box and bringing in a higher concentrate to mix with what they are currently producing.
It is crucial that NSL and IFO have a solid and trusting relationship. IFO's reputation hinges on their chosen suppliers providing the product as specified on time and on price and with the end customer being happy. If NSL continues to do this, the orders will continue to roll in.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: FNN Interview with CEO
Buying a higher percentage ore to mix with their own is good...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ELE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.27M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
ELE (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online