1. Most Discussed
  2. Gainers & Losers

a few linguistic twists in ancient books, final.

  1. lrjones

    1,781 posts.
    Why did I post this overview?

    Was it to try to embarrass Trader Mick, enjoyable as that would be in itself, that is not the reason.

    I have a strongly held view that the thing that Islam needs more than anything else is to examine it's religion in terms of pluralism and living in, and in co operation with Western democracies.

    Now I've noticed how Trader Mick and Fall Guy and others want to tip toe through the daisies for fear of offending Muslims.

    About 18 months or so ago I was listening to an Egyptian professor in sociology on the ABC.

    He said: "Muslims respect Christians because they believe in God and they are people of the Book" ( a muslim expression (Qu'ran) for Jews and Christians)..so when we disagree we are talking about God.. but we despise the liberals because when they say how wonderful our religion is, we ask them. If Islam is so wonderful then why don't you become Muslim.?... We know they believe in nothing and patronise us. That's why we despise them. Christians believe in the same God."

    I would put Trader Mick, Fall Guy and others in that category. Rabs and others want to know about Islam and how it intersects with the Australian Ethos. They know a lot more about Islam than when they started and that quest will not hurt them or anybody else.

    In a paradoxical way it could well be the Rabs of this world who have thought through these issues who will be better able, in time, to coax their reticent Muslim neighbours into becoming part of a truly pluralist Australia.

    I've had some great religious arguments with Muslims who are still my friends. Respect isn't gained by patronising other's ideas. To debate a Muslim tells him that you have taken the time to study what he holds as important and that you take it seriously enough to discuss it with him.

    I posted this piece because ,whether you agree with the writers conclusions or not, this is the objective ground where Moslems, Jews and Christians discuss their religion. lrj.


    CONCLUSION:

    Now that we have carried out a cursory study of the historicity for both the Qur'an and the Bible, it is important that we make some conclusions. What can we say concerning the veracity of these two scriptures in light of the evidence produced by the manuscript, document and archeological data at our disposal?

    Starting with the Qur'an, it is reasonable to conclude that these findings indeed give us reason for pause concerning its reliability. Manuscript, as well as documentary and archaeological evidence indicates that much of what the Qur'an maintains does not coincide with the historical data at our disposal which comes from that period. From the material amassed from external sources in the7th-8th centuries, we now know:

    1) that the Jews still retained a relationship with the Arabs until at least 640 A.D.;

    2) that Jerusalem and not Mecca was more-than-likely the city which contained the original sanctuary for Islam, as Mecca was not only unknown as a viable city until the end of the seventh century, but it was not even on the international trade route;

    3) that the Qibla (direction of prayer) was not fixed towards Mecca until the eighth century, but to an area much further north, possibly Jerusalem;

    4) that the Dome of the Rock situated in Jerusalem was possibly the original sanctuary;

    5) that Muhammad was not known as the seal of prophets until the late seventh century;

    6) that the earliest we even hear of any Qur'an is not until the mid-eighth century;

    7) and that the earliest Qur'anic writings do not coincide with the current Qur'anic text. All of this data contradicts the Qur'an which is in our possession, and adds to the suspicion that the Qur'an which we now read is NOT the same as that which was supposedly collated and canonized in 650 A.D. under Uthman, as Muslims contend (if indeed it even existed at that time). One can only assume that there must have been an evolution in the Qur'anic text. Consequently, the sole thing we can say with a certainty is that only the documents which we now possess (from 790 A.D. onwards) are the same as that which is in our hands today, written not 16 years after Muhammad's death but 160 years later, and thus not 1,400 years ago, but only 1,200 years ago.


    As for the Bible, with the abundance of existing manuscripts (handwritten copies) of the New Testament (more than 24,000), we know little has been lost through the transmission of the text. In fact there is more evidence for the reliability of the text of the New Testament than there is for any ten pieces of classical literature put together. It is in better textual shape than the 37 plays of William Shakespeare which were written a mere 300 years ago, after the invention of the printing press! This is indeed surprising, considering the early period in which the manuscripts were compiled, as well as the flimsy material on which they were written. The fact that we have such an abundance of manuscripts still in our possession points to the importance the scriptures have held for the church over the centuries. As far as we can know, the names, places, and events mentioned in the Bible have been recorded accurately so that what we have is the representation of what God said and did. Besides the massive numbers of early New Testament documents, the Old Testament can also be substantiated by the Jewish community who continue to corroborate the proof for its accuracy, as well as documents such as the Septuagint and the Dead Sea Scrolls which give added weight to the claim that it has never been changed.

    Even the Qur'an, possibly written during the 7th-8th centuries recognized the authority of our scriptures (see suras 2:136; 3:2-3; 4:136; 5:47-52,68; 10:95; 21:7; and 29:46). We also know that, outside of the few scribal errors, the historical events and personages are adequately correct, as they do not confuse names, dates and events, and in fact, surprisingly, continue to coincide with current archaeological findings. This is indeed significant, since with each successive year, ongoing documental and archaeological discoveries fail to divulge any historical contradictions. Instead they continue to corroborate what the Bible has been saying for 2,000-3,000 years (examples such as the Ebla tablets, or the newly discovered tomb of the priest Caiaphus give continuing credibility to the scriptures historical trustworthiness).

    Therefore, the testimony of the historical evidence is that the Bible and not the Qur'an can be trusted as an accurate and reliable historical document. While we continue to unearth data which substantiates the Bible's accuracy, we likewise unearth further data which erradicates the validity for the Qur'anic account. If a scripture claims to be a revelation from God, it must prove its claim by establishing its historical credentials, to the extent that even a third party can agree upon the evidence provided. This the Bible and not the Qur'an does adequately.

    We must also know that the Bible is unique? Consider: Here is a book written over a 1,500 year span (about 40 generations), by more than 40 authors, among whose number were found: kings, peasants, philosophers, fishermen, poets, statesmen, scholars, a herdsman, a general, a cupbearer, a doctor, a tax collector, and a rabbi. It was written on three continents: Asia, Africa, and Europe, and in three languages: Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. Its subject matter includes hundreds of controversial topics, yet from Genesis right on through to Revelation the authors all spoke with harmony and continuity on the theme of the unfolding story of "God's redemption of humanity."

    It should not surprise us then that the Bible continues to be the source of God's revelation to His creation, for families and communities around the world, and that, according to the latest statistics, the Bible and not the Qu'ran is uncontested as the most popular book ever written. The statistics prove that it is read by more people and published in more languages than any other book in the history of humanity, so that even now "one copy of the Bible is published every three seconds day and night; or 22 copies every minute day and night; or 1,369 copies every hour day and night; and 32,876 copies every day in the year, and so on...".



    REFERENCES CITED:

    Bonwetsch, N. (ed.), "Doctrina Iacobi nuper baptizati," in Abhandlungen der Koniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Gottingen, Philologisch-historische Klasse, N.s., vol. xii, Berlin, 1910
    Brock, S.P., "Syriac Views of Emergent Islam," Studies on the First Century of Islamic Society,edited by G.H.A. Juynboll, Carbondale, So.Ill.Univ.Press, 1982
    Bulliet, R.W., The Camel and the Wheel, Cambridge, Mass., 1975
    Cook, Michael, Muhammad, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1983
    Creswell, K.A.C., Early Muslim Architecture, vol.i, part one, Oxford, 1969
    id. A Short Account of Early Muslim Architecture, (Revised by James W. Allan), Aldershot,Scolar Press, 1989
    Crone, Patricia & Cook, Michael, Hagarism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977 Crone, Patricia, Slaves on Horses, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980
    id, Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam, Princeton University Press, 1987
    De Goeje, M. & P.de Jong (eds.), Fragmenta Historicorum Arabicorum, vol.i, Leyden, 1869
    Elson, John, "Eyewitnesses Jesus?", Time, April 8, 1996, pg.60
    Fehervari, G., Development of the Mihrab down to the XIVth Century, London Ph.D. 1961 Feinburg, C.L., The New Bible Dictionary (2nd ed.), Leicester, Inter-Varsity Press, 1993
    Gilchrist, John, Jam' Al-Qur'an, Jesus to the Muslims, 1989
    Glubb, John, The Life and Times of Muhammad, New York, Stein and Day, 1971
    Groom, N., Frankincense and Myrrh, a Study of the Arabian Incense Trade, London, 1981 Humphreys, R.S., Islamic History, a framework for Enquiry, Princeton, 1991
    Jeffrey, A. (tr.), 'Ghevond's (Levond's) text of the Correspondence between 'Umar II and Leo III', The Harvard Theological Review, 1944
    Kister, M.J., Mecca and Tamim, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 8 (1965), 117-163
    Lemonick, Michael D., "Are the Bible Stories True?", Time, December 18, 1995, pgs. 50-58
    Lings, M., & Safadi, Y.H., The Qur'an, (A catalogue of an exhibition of Qur'an manuscripts at the British Library, 3 April-15 August 1976), British Library, World of Islam Pub. Co., 1976 al-Maqrizi, Ahmad b. 'Ali, Kitab al-mawa'iz wa'l-i'tibar, Cairo, 1326
    McDowell, Josh, Christianity; A Ready Defence, Harpendon, Scripture Press Foundation, 1991 id, Evidence That Demands a Verdict, Vols.I & II, Harpendon, Scripture Press Foundation, 1990 Muller, W.W., "Weibrauch...," off-print: Pauly-Wissowa, Realencyclopadie, Supplement and 15, Munich, 1978
    Nau, F., 'Un colloque du Patriarche Jean avec l'emir des Agareens,' Journal asiatique, 1915
    Nevo, Yehuda D., "Towards a Prehistory of Islam," Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, vol.17, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1994
    Ostling, Richard N., "A Step Closer to Jesus", Time, Jan.23, 1995, pg.57
    Patkanean K.R. (ed.), Patmout'iun Sebeosi Episkoposi i Herakln, St. Petersburg, 1879
     Pfander, C.G., The Mizanu'l Haqq ( Balance of Truth'), London, The Religious Tract Society, 1910 (& 1835)
    Rippin, Andrew, "Literary Analysis of Qur'an, Tafsir, and Sira, the Methodologies of John Wansbrough", Approaches to Islam in Religious Studies, Richard C. Martin (ed.), Tucson, Univ. of Arizona Press, 1985
    id, Muslims, Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, vol. 1, London, Routledge, 1990
    Schacht, Joseph, "A Revaluation of Islamic Traditions," Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain, Hertford, Stephen Austin, 1949
    Schimmel, Annemarie, Calligraphy and Islamic Culture, New York, New York University Press, 1984
    Sebeos, Bishop, Histoire d'Heraclius, tr. F. Macler, Paris, 1904
    Shorrosh, Anis A., Islam Revealed, A Christian Arab's View of Islam, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1988
    Sprenger, A., Das Leben und die Lehre des Mohammad, 2nd ed., Vol. 3, Berlin, 1869
    Van Berchem, M., Materiaux pour un Corpus Inscriptionum Arabicarum, part two, vol.ii, Cairo, 1927
    Van Ess, J., Fruhe Mu'tazilitische Haresiographie, Beirut, 1971
    Wansbrough, J., Quranic Studies: Sources and Methods of Scriptural Interpretation, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1977
    id, The Sectarian Milieu: Content and Composition of Islamic Salvation History, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1978


DISCLAIMER:
Before making any financial decisions based on what you read, always consult an advisor or expert.

The HotCopper website is operated by Report Card Pty Ltd. Any information posted on the website has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs and as such, you should before acting on the information or advice, consider the appropriateness of the information or advice in relation to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Please be aware that any information posted on this site should not be considered to be financial product advice.

From time to time comments aimed at manipulating other investors may appear on these forums. Posters may post overly optimistic or pessimistic comments on particular stocks, in an attempt to influence other investors. It is not possible for management to moderate all posts so some misleading and inaccurate posts may still appear on these forums. If you do have serious concerns with a post or posts you should report a Terms of Use Violation (TOU) on the link above. Unless specifically stated persons posting on this site are NOT investment advisors and do NOT hold the necessary licence, or have any formal training, to give investment advice.

Top