I thought somebody would have noticed this.
Union royal commission finds no evidence of serious wrongdoing by Julia Gillard
Royal commission into trade union governance and corruption
Union royal commission finds no evidence of serious wrongdoing by Julia Gillard
Interim report recommends criminal charges be considered against scores of officials from three unions
Julia Gillard
Friday 19 December 2014 14.00 AEST
The royal commission into trade union corruption has recommended criminal charges be considered against scores of officials from three unions but has found no evidence of serious wrongdoing or criminality by Julia Gillard.
One volume of the royal commission’s interim report has been kept confidential because it deals with serious threats to witnesses which it says amount to “grave threats to the power and authority of the Australian state”.
The workplace relations minister, Eric Abetz, repeatedly refused to summarise the findings of the report about the former prime minister and said calling the royal commission had “never been about the pursuit of Ms Gillard, it was about hundreds of thousands of dollars being obtained by fraud and no one ever being brought to justice”.
Advertisement
“The report speaks for itself … it shows clearly our request to have these issues ventilated has been vindicated,” Abetz said.
In opposition senior Coalition figures made serious allegations against Gillard and legal advice she gave as a young lawyer to her then boyfriend, the Australian Workers Union official Bruce Wilson, as he set up what was later revealed to be a union “slush fund”.
But the interim report says that “findings are made that Julia Gillard did not commit any crime and was not aware of any criminality on the part of … union officials”.
By discussing the name of the slush fund on an application for its incorporation, it says: “Julia Gillard’s conduct in this respect must be regarded as a lapse of professional judgment, but nothing more sinister.”
Advertisement
The report does recommend Victorian and West Australian authorities consider fraud charges against Wilson and his union “bagman”, Ralph Blewitt.
The royal commissioner, Dyson Heydon, said he accepted evidence from a retired builder, Athol James, and another former AWU staffer, Wayne Hem, that Gillard had received “certain funds” from Wilson. But he said “the skimpy nature of the available evidence does not make it possible to infer on the balance of probabilities that Julia Gillard was aware that she had received the $5,000 which Wayne Hem put into her bank account on Bruce Wilson’s instructions”.
In 2012 Julie Bishop, now the foreign minister, told the Coalition party room that Gillard had been a knowing accomplice to Wilson. “She provided the stolen vehicle, she drove him to the bank and she looked away while he robbed the bank,”’ Bishop said, according to the official party spokesman.
“She [Gillard] and Wilson and [sidekick Ralph] Blewitt wanted to hide from the AWU the fact that an unauthorised entity was being set up to siphon funds for their benefit and not for the benefit of the AWU,” Bishop said to reporters, although she toned down her remarks later that same day.
Major recommendations in the interim report include:
That the commonwealth director of public prosecutions consider criminal charges against officials from the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Electrical trade union and the Health Services Union.
That blackmail charges be considered against the Victorian secretary of the CFMEU and the union’s assistant secretary.
That the Australian Securities and Investment Commission consider charges against the Queensland state secretary of the CFMEU.
Abetz said the report bolstered the government’s case to introduce the Registered Organisations Commission – an independent oversight body for unions and employers – and reintroduce the building industry watchdog, the Australian Building and Construction Commission. Neither organisation is specifically mentioned by the royal commission.
He said the report revealed a “systemic culture” of criminality within sections of the trade union movement and called on Labor to pass legislation introducing both bodies if it wanted to see “a clean trade union movement”.
The president of the ACTU, Ged Kearney, said the report was “designed to weaken the unions” but failed to expose any wrongdoing by Gillard.
“The Abbott government owes former prime minister Julia Gillard an apology, the smoking gun wasn’t there,” Kearney said.
She said it was a waste of taxpayer money because it had “nothing to say there’s widespread corruption” in the unions.
Targeting Gillard’s involvement in the AWU affair was widely seen as a key motivation for the government setting up the royal commission, and the former prime minister John Howard said in a televised interview he was “uneasy” at the move.
“I’m uneasy about the idea of having royal commissions or inquiries into essentially a political decision on which the public has already delivered a verdict … I don’t think you should ever begin to go down the American path of using the law for narrow targeted political purposes,” he said. “I think the special prosecutions in the US are appalling.”
The royal commission also foreshadowed its final report was likely to recommend changes to legislation setting up compulsory superannuation. It says parts of that legislation mean some collective agreements can effectively force employees to contribute to a union-run fund.
“The consequence of the provision is to deny employees genuine freedom of choice,” the royal commission finds.
The government has given the royal commission a one-year extension – until December 2015 – to provide its final report. The said it would respond to the interim report next year.
http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2014/dec/19/union-royal-commission-finds-no-evidence-of-serious-wrongdoing-by-julia-Gillard