Fossil Fuel companies a threat to democracy?

  1. 13,015 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 39
    Fossil Fuel companies a threat to democracy?

    Sunday 21 September 2014 8:45AM
    World leaders are preparing to meet in New York next week for a major United Nations conference on Climate Change.
    US President Barack Obama and UK Prime Minister David Cameron will be there. But along with the leaders of India and China our Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, will not be attending, even though he will be in New York the next day for various councils of war dealing with the situation in the Middle East.
    The foreign minister will represent us in the climate change discussions.
    Dr Kevin Taft, a Former Liberal Party politician in Alberta, Canada has written a Perspectives paper for the Whitlam Institute at the University of Western Sydney called, Fossil fuels, global warming and democracy: a report from a scene of the collision, in which he argues that democracy will be challenged perhaps fatally by global warming because of the influence of the resource giants that will fight to protect their interests.

    Fossil fuels, global warming and democracy: a report from a scene of the collision

    Link to Resource:

    Fossil fuels, global warming and democracy: a report from a scene of the collision
    External Links icon

    Kevin Taft
    Whitlam Institute
    University of Western Sydney
    10 September 2014
    What happens to democracy when the fossil fuel industry collides with global warming?
    Introduction
    Democracy is caught in a collision between two forces: the need to respond to global warming by cutting carbon emissions, and the demands of the fossil fuel industry to increase carbon use and production. This is a slow motion collision that will take decades to conclude, though its ending seems inevitable: coal, and then oil and natural gas, will be replaced by more sustainable energy sources, but only after great damage to the environment.
    In this paper I explore the question, What happens to democracy when the fossil fuel industry collides with global warming?
    This collision is already making its marks on democratic practices. The fossil fuel industry is using every tool it can to preserve its wealth and power by pressuring governments, political parties, universities, regulators, courts, and voters. It is a process of tough, aggressive, and sophisticated politics that ultimately depends on denying the evidence that global warming poses a danger that needs to be urgently confronted.
    Without a theoretical framework to focus this inquiry, it could easily produce little more than a list of anecdotes about politics and influence. The value of good theory is that it reveals the patterns in the evidence, showing how the disparate pieces are connected to one another, and to larger historical, social, and economic factors. In this paper, I drew theory from (among others) Valerie Bunce, Timothy Mitchell, and most importantly Terry Lynn Karl.
    I use the work of these scholars to focus on the Canadian province of Alberta. Alberta provides an example of what can happen to democracy in places where fossil fuel production predominates. From time-to-time I link the paper to Australia, which depends even more than Canada on mineral extraction, and which is on the burning edge of global warming.
    This paper should be read as a warning to people everywhere who are concerned about fossil fuel dependence, global warming, and democracy. Those who value democracy must ask, Can democracy as we know it survive global warming?

    Publication Details

    Collections:
    Climate Change Adaptation
    Coverage:
    Canada, Australia
    Publication Type:
    Report
    Format:
    Research
    Permanent URL:
    http://apo.org.au/node/41235
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.