Can you please reword this.
"you cannot acknowledge that PDO has no correlation with, let alone causation for the overall warming trend, despite categoric evidence that is the case."
Not sure where your going with this
Any comment on the AMO.
You made the statement not me. You goaded me into putting this thread up and I have with papers to boot.
You need to understand the earth and all it's variabilities. Internal and external. you don't an nor do the scientist. They tell us so on every paper they do, that more work is required.
My half baked ocean theory has observational data to back it up.
Your theory is based on assumptions.
Here is a post on another thread.
Ferro at the end of the day if the science is settled I just want someone to tell me what they think the agw rate of rise was between the 70's to 90s.
For them to acknowledge that PDO can absorb 0.2'C of AGW warming they have to then acknowledge that the PDO can also then put out that much energy during its warming phase.
They will never ever admit to that.
keep digging holes boys
For a settled science I don't know why it is so hard to get a answer.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- For Mjp amusement
Can you please reword this. "you cannot acknowledge that PDO has...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online